The 2-Sigma Study, 2026

How much can a young brain learn under ideal conditions?

In 1984, Bloom reported that 1:1 tutoring outperformed classroom instruction by two standard deviations. We are running this study again, at greater scale, with modern rigor.

Every tutor will receive training in the best of learning science, deliberate practice, and formative assessment, with full freedom to do what is right for the child in front of them. Training begins in August 2026, with an optional early start in June for tutors who are ready.

Grades 3 to 4 · Virtual 1:1 math & ELA · August 2026 start

Enroll your child → ↓ Read on

No intervention in the history of education research has produced a comparable effect size.

On the critique

Recent reanalyses of Bloom's 1984 paper have argued that the two-sigma effect was not typical of tutoring in practice. We take that seriously. This study is designed to find the real ceiling, measured carefully, with pre-registered methods, strong controls, and open data.

The methods

Each child receives a dedicated tutor focused only on them for the full year. Tutors are hired as a team, not in isolation. They meet often to share what is working, to teach each other the techniques that move a child forward, and to swap students when a different match will help more.

The control group receives typical classroom instruction. We will publish our benchmarks, evaluations, curriculum, and results in full.

Why now

Now that AI exists, the cost curve of personalized instruction has broken. The data and methods this study produces can inspire builders to recreate these outcomes for every child. Our hope: an education that used to cost $100,000 a year, in every kid's pocket, for under $100.

Join the study

Our tutor cohort is full.

We have finished hiring the 18 tutors who will run the 2026 study. We are now building the team that supports them — an engineering role opens soon.

A non-profit study in collaboration with leading universities. Funded by Reed Hastings.